Analyzing the usage of Web 2.0
The development between Web1.0 and 2.0 was a
huge step in the evolution of technological communication and social media. At
first it took me quite some time reading over the ‘Reader 1’ to distinguish what
it is exactly, and in doing so I have come up with my own definition to aid my
understanding: Web 2.0 is a system of communication via the world wide web,
where there is an act and ability of two way communication.
The use of Web2.0 is so set in the trends of
today’s society that without it, the system of social media would be lost on
how to operate. Taken from the ‘features of community’, there are some factors
that play a big part for this ‘system’ to be so desirable, such as: being accessible
anywhere in the world, interface is quick and easy to use, there is ownership
on own data therefore personalization is allowed.
The
‘notion of participation’ is key to the ability of interaction between people
(O’Reilly), which supports Web 2.0 to keep running and developing. Hamilton
states that participation is a function with factors such as time, skill,
financial commitment and that an increase will contribute to successful
development of relationships and democratization of media. I do agree (with
regarding to Gruber’s three processes) that it will continue to be used and
grow as Web 2.0 encourages users to take control over the production of data, a
factor contributing it to be so popular (eg facebook, google).
Relating to
the statistics from January 2013 on social media, it is actually amazing how
much society uses Web 2.0:
·
Facebook-1
billion users, more than 42 million pages and 9 million apps
·
Instagram-
100 million registered and 4 billion photos
·
Youtube- 800
million users, 4 billion views per day
·
Gmail- 287
million users
·
Skype-280 Million users
The quote
about facebook,” a social
system, where people interact, improve the user experience for others by
sharing content… and then link other people to events, experiences and
content,” sums up the whole idea of how powerful social networking is.
I have
realized Web 2.0 is also very useful in my field of work practice- the dance world!
To get anywhere, a lot of it is about connections, which relates to the idea of
harnessing collective intelligence (third core competency, O’Reilly). Web 2.0
has ‘allowed communities to develop beyond their existing professional
networks’ where networking has stepped up to a whole different level, and
through this ‘social space’ they can ‘come together as equals.’ I can relate to
this idea by comparing my experience at Elmhurst: when auditioning I had
contacts at Elmhurst (existing network) and afterwards had to the ability to
contact different companies through emails, Network Dance etc. These days it’s so much easier and useful to
connect with directors, dancers, and stage managers etc. Sites like Linkedn and
Network Dance are great for networking in the professional and business field.
For example if a choreographer or dancer is needed, especially last minute,
these sites instantaneously supply the information. Ballet News is a brilliant
site to keep informed on the current dance news for everyone one in its field. You
Tube is now taking over for audition DVD’s, promotional videos, even for talent
seeking ( e.g. Justin Beiber!)
Another thought
came to mind… the development between Web 1.0 to 2.0 and how the dancers 10-20
years ago auditioned. They had to use the film cameras, send videotapes and letters
that would take so much time with not much freedom for second takes and tweaking.
Now a day
you can get professional photographers with digital cameras, create a folder
with a C.V, copy a YouTube link of a video and send everything off via email.
I would get
so stressed about trying to get the perfect ‘package together,’ but now I appreciate
the technologies we have today making it all so much more efficient.
However
ethical considerations do need to be regarded because social networking is not
all positive. Unfortunately everything posted is non-reversible! Whatever is up
is immediately exposed to future or current employers, friends, family members
and practically the whole world. We all need to be careful with putting up too
much information on our whereabouts, in addition with plagiarism issues- a huge
annoyance to any artist, writer, and producer of any kind.
There is one
word to think about here- dignity! Managing to keep your dignity through social
networking I believe will distinguish the needed ‘balance between your
professional and private life’ (Nottingham, 2013).
Gaby - like how you are relating the ideas to your practice e.g. "I can relate to this idea by comparing my experience at Elmhurst: when auditioning I had contacts at Elmhurst (existing network) and afterwards had to the ability to contact different companies through emails, Network Dance etc". Your term exposure is a good word for this - we all need exposure to share our ideas and to connect with others but exposure might think consideration. Are we all our own branding agents. We once had an inquiry on personal branding... interesting to relate to Web 2.0.
ReplyDelete