Rising up to the challenge with Reader 4!
Professional inquiry is ‘…a way to learn about what you are
doing,’ within your own workplace. I have become intrigued to look into why
dancers dance, and what is their stimulation to keep going through all that hardship.
However there is so much more to this topic:
· what
dancers do in for their development as an artist, which enables them to keep on
going.
· Different
stimulations- music, passion, exercise, endorphins, movement
· Mental
aspects
·
Physical aspects
I am aware that to develop these topics, knowledge from all
aspects will be needed. Knowledge is a key word to many theories and points of
learning in the reader: work-based, single and double loop learning,
disciplinary vs transdisciplinary learning and researching literature. I have
been able to distinguish a few of these points within the reader that could be
used to develop my own inquiry.
Work-based learning promotes awareness of a workplace to be considered
a learning environment. Although not working/dancing in the moment, the whole
idea of my inquiry started through reflecting and gaining some invaluable
knowledge within a work-based environment/scenario. Whilst injured during
applying for a company and afterwards watching an international competition, all
I wanted to do was dance! From this constant need to move, it came to mind why
I still wanted to keep going? Why dancers keep going on no matter what?
Learning from my own mistakes, and being able to reflect upon
it within a dancing environment promoted me to come up with this idea.
I also came up with inquiring about what dancers do themselves
to aid in developing as artists - how much to rehearse, how to nurse an injury,
what exercises to do, how to keep fit, deal with competition and castings etc. This
all links to the idea of ‘learning through experience’ from a company/workplace,
i.e work-based learning.
Chris Argyris’s single and double-loop learning theory I found intriguing
how it relates to the different learning mechanisms between dance and inquiring
about it, looking at it from the outside.
Single loop learning emphasizes on techniques being made more
efficient, following a set of policies/ rules. The basic knowledge in dance is
similar where there are certain techniques to follow, recommendations within
the arts industry. However double loop learning involves questioning the role
of learning systems/frameworks, which lead towards real goals and strategies.
Now the underlying knowledge is there for all dancers, but they
only really learn how to improve and reach for those goals when they broaden
the horizon, think out of the box in every aspect where the great saying of
learning from experience will work the magic! I find that exploring like this,
discovering and questioning, looking at all aspects within the topic will help
reach out to the true goals of my inquiry. The Reader states that ‘recognising
knowledge in the workplace will be important in identifying topics or issues
that could benefit from professional inquiry.’ (Knowledge and skills in the
workplace, Reader 4, pg.12)
The SIG groups are a great example in identifying your basic
knowledge on a topic, to then be able to compare other opinions/knowledge with
a range of practitioners This has helped structure and bring new dimensions to
my inquiry, to broaden my mind: e.g. Laura May Houghton came up with a point of
the fundamental reason why dancers dance is because maybe it has been all they
have known? I had never looked at it from that angle, making me realize and
question all the other feelings other than the enjoyment of dance.
In some ways dance involves disciplinary learning, however to
achieve goals and succeed in development it entails transdisciplinary learning.
You could say the exact same thing for propositional v.s process knowledge
(Etraut, 1992)
I understand fully that to follow this approach of learning in
addition to a few pointers from the reader- researching, reviewing literature,
engaging with fellow practitioners (SIG groups), will help broadening the
horizons.
Here is a great extract from Peter Senge’s view on the
‘learning organization’:
‘…real learning gets to the heart of what it is to be human. We
become able to re-create ourselves. This applies to both individuals and
organizations. Thus, for a ‘learning organization it is not enough to survive.
‘”Survival learning” or what is more often termed “adaptive learning” is
important – indeed it is necessary. But for a learning organization, “adaptive
learning” must be joined by “generative learning”, learning that enhances our
capacity to create.’ (Senge, 1990)
As ‘the ultimate goal of the inquiry will
be to explore a topic that will benefit your work and the work of colleagues
and fellow professionals,’ it was a little hard at first to see how my inquiry
would create these benefits. To find the real truth about that underlying
stimulation to move is where I am headed. However from this, I would love to be
able to extract all those different feelings and emotions, and somehow make it
known, make it felt to the audience and outside world. To create an
understanding of what the real dance world is like… now that would just be
fantastic!
Good to hear about your interests and how you are thinking about several of the theories introduced to look at a possible inquiry topic - why dancers dance. Might be worth touching base again as you swing into Reader 5 with ethics - so look at the ethical questions using for inquiry topic as a base to see how you can build an ethical approach into your inquiry,
ReplyDelete